Login | Member benefits | Join us
Researchers PDFs
AIFST Fresh Produce Food Safety Summit
Aphids & Viruses
Broccoli Export Seminar
Carabid beetles as sustainability indicators
Clubroot - Nursery Access
Clubroot - Nursery Cleaning
Clubroot - Nursery Contamination
Clubroot - Nursery Design
Clubroot - Nursery Monitoring
Clubroot - Nursery Response
Clubroot - Nursery Sources
Hangzhou Foods
IPM - approach to Potato crops
IPM - approach to practice change
IPM - Potato/Tomato Psyllid
Lettuce Anthracnose Management
Native Plants - Food Safety
Native Plants - Food Standards
NY9406 Downy Mildew on seedlings - factsheet
NY9406 Downy Mildew on seedlings - report
NY9406 Downy Mildew on seedlings - review
NY97011 Downy Mildew on seedlings - extension
NY97011 Downy Mildew on seedlings - notes
Parsley Disease Handbook
Parsnip Variety Trials
Phytochemical composition of food
Phytochemicals and Healthy Foods
Reclaimed water - risk model
Reclaimed water use in Victoria
Recycled Water Quality - Lettuce
Sclerotina - Lettuce Conference 2002
Strategies for Control of Root Rot in Apiaceae Crops
Summer Root Rot in Parsley
Thrips & Viruses
Vegetable Disease Program
Vegetable Diseases in Australia
Vegetables Viruses
VG00013 Leek Diseases
VG00016 Environmental Performance
VG00026 IPM Eggplant & Cucumber
VG00031 Peas - downy mildew & collar rot
VG00031 Peas - Downy Mildew - metalaxyl resistance
VG00034 Capsicum & Chillies - weed control
VG00044 Clubroot - Applicator design
VG00044 Clubroot - Chemical control
VG00044 Clubroot - Implementing a control strategy
VG00044 Clubroot - Managing outbreaks
VG00044 Clubroot - Nutritional amendments
VG00044 Clubroot - Strategic application
VG00044 Clubroot – Introduction
VG00044 Clubroot – Limes and liming
VG00044 Clubroot – Prevention & Hygiene
VG00044 Clubroot – Understanding Risk
VG00044 Total Clubroot Management
VG00048 Alternate fungicides for sclerotinia control
VG00048 Brassica green manure conference paper 2004
VG00048 Brassica Green Manure Update 16
VG00048 Brassica Green Manure Update 18
VG00048 Diallyl Disulphide - DADS - trials
VG00048 Lettuce - Sclerotinia biocontrol
VG00048 Lettuce Sclerotina - Biocontrols
VG00058 Pea - Collar Rot
VG00069 Cucumber & Capsicum diseases
VG00084 Beetroot for Processing
VG01045 Bunching Vegetables - disease control
VG01049 Compost - Benefits
VG01049 Compost - Choosing a Supplier
VG01049 Compost - Getting Started
VG01049 Compost - Introduction
VG01049 Compost - Safe Use
VG01049 Safe Use of Poultry Litter
VG01082 Broccoli Adjuvant Poster
VG01082 Broccoli Head Rot
VG01096 Article - White Rot research
VG01096 Integrated Control of Onion White Rot
VG01096 Poster - Alternative fungicides
VG01096 Poster - Diallyl Disulphide - DADS
VG01096 Poster - Trichoderma biocontrol
VG01096 Poster - Trichoderma optimisation
VG01096 White Rot - Spring Onions
VG02020 Capsicum - Sudden Wilt
VG02035 Capsicum - virus resistance
VG02105 Vegetable Seed Dressing Review
VG02118 White Blister
VG03003 Lettuce - Varnish Spot
VG03092 Lettuce - Shelf Life
VG03100 Retailing Vegetables - Broccolini®
VG04010 Maximising returns from water
VG04012 Hydroponic lettuce - root rot
VG04013 Brassica White Blister
VG04013 White Blister - Control Strategies
VG04013 White Blister - Race ID
VG04013 White Blister - Risk Forecasting
VG04013 White Blister - Symptoms
VG04013 White Blister - Workshop Notes
VG04014 Better Brassica
VG04014 better brassica - roadshow model
VG04014 better brassica - workshop notes
VG04014 Clubroot Guidebook
VG04014 Clubroot Poster
VG04015 Benchmarking water use
VG04016 Celery leaf blight - Poster
VG04016 Celery Septoria
VG04019 Nitrate & Nitrite in Leafy Veg
VG04021 Vegetable Seed Treatment
VG04025 Parsley Root Rot
VG04059 Diagnostic test kits
VG04061 White Blister - alternative controls
VG04061 White Blister - Workshop 2007
VG04062 Beetroot Study Tour
VG04067 IPM - Lettuce Aphid
VG05007 Onion White Rot - post plant fungicides
VG05008 IPM - Cultural Controls
VG05014 IPM - Native vegetation pt1
VG05044 IPM - Consultants Survey
VG05044 IPM - Grower Survey
VG05044 IPM - Lettuce Aphid Trials
VG05044 IPM - Lettuce Disease Poster
VG05044 IPM - Predatory Mites
VG05044 IPM - Project Summary
VG05045 Parsnip Canker
VG05051 Climate Change
VG05053 Rhubarb Viruses
VG05068 Baby Leaf Salad Crops
VG05073 Mechanical Harvesting
VG05090 Green Bean - Sclerotinia
VG05090 Rhizoctonia Groups
VG06014 Revegetation for thrip control
VG06024 IPM - Native vegetation pt2
VG06046 Parsley Root Rot
VG06047 Celery - Septoria Predictive Model
VG06066 LOTE Grower Communications
VG06086 IPM - Potential & Requirements
VG06087 IPM - Lettuce Aphid
VG06087 IPM - Toxicity testing
VG06088 IPM - Lettuce Aphid trials
VG06092 Pathogens - Gap Analysis
VG06092 Pathogens of Importance - poster
VG06140 Beetroot - colour quality
VG07010 Systemic aquired resistance
VG07015 Curcubit field guide
VG07070 Conference Notes 2008
VG07070 Foliar diseases
VG07070 Nitrogen & lettuce diseases
VG07070 Predicting Downy Mildew on Lettuce
VG07070 White Blister - Chinese Cabbage
VG07070 White Blister - Cultural Controls
VG07070 Workshop Notes - 2008
VG07070 Workshop Notes - 2010
VG07125 IPM - soilborne diseases
VG07126 Biofumigation oils for white rot
VG07126 New approaches to sclerotina
VG07127 White Blister - Alternative Controls
VG08020 Optimising water & nutrient use
VG08026 Pythium - field day
VG08026 Pythium - workshop 2010
VG08026 Pythium control strategies - overview
VG08107 - Carbon Footprint - workshop
VG08107 - Carbon Footprint part 1 - definitions
VG08107 - Carbon Footprint part 2 - issues
VG08107 - Carbon Footprint part 3 - calculators
VG08107 - Carbon Footprint part 4 - estimate
VG08107 - Carbon Footprint part 5 - users
VG08107 - Carbon Footprint part 6 - options
VG08426 Parsnip - Pythium Notes 2010
VG09086 Evaluation of Vegetable Washing
VG09159 Grower Study Tour- Spring Onions & Radish
VG96015 Carrot Crown Rot
VG96015 Carrot Defects - Poster
VG97042 Export - Burdock, Daikon and Shallots
VG97051 Pea - ascochyta rot
VG97064 Greenhouse Tomato and Capsicum
VG97084 Green Bean - white rot
VG97103 Celery Mosaic Virus
VG98011 Carrot - Cavity Spot
VG98048 Lettuce - Adapting to Change
VG98083 Lettuce - rots & browning
VG98085 GM Brassicas
VG98093 Microbial hazards - review
VG98093 Safe vegetable production
VG99005 Quality wash water
VG99008 Clubroot - rapid test
VG99016 Compost and Vegetable Production
VG99030 Globe Artichokes - value adding
VG99054 Onions - Theraputic Compounds
VG99057 Soil Health Indicators
VG99070 IPM - Celery
Victorian soil health
VN05010 Folicur - alternative carriers
VN05010 Onion White Rot - Fungicides
VN05010 Onion White Rot - summary
VX00012 Metalaxyl breakdown
VX99004 Clean & Safe Fresh Vegetables
Whitefly & Viruses
Contact Details

PO Box 138
273 Camberwell Rd
Camberwell, VIC 3124

Tel: 0437037613
Fax: 03 9882 6722
Login or Sign up now!

Latest News

Bayer Vegetables Forum
Read more here...

Agricultural Trailers
Read more here...

Food Safety Proposal For Comment
Read more here...

Supermarket Cuts Veg Prices
Read more here...

Green Snail Alert
Read more here...

VG05073 Mechanical Harvesting

There are moves by large processors, the food service sector and some retailers to supplement Australian produce with imports, taking advantage of better pricing and to hedge the risk of shortages in domestic supply.

Growers will need to vastly improve their handling techniques, internal cost structures and negotiating skills to deal with these changes,

The following report reviews the current status of mechanical harvesting and defines the crops that would benefit the greatest from the introduction of mechanical harvesting, including :

  • existing mechanical harvesting techniques and practices

  • adoption of mechanical harvesting in the Australian vegetable supply chain

  • issues of technology impact on supply chains

  • barriers to adoption of technology including capital costs and needs for change.

In addition the report includes a systems analysis for selected crops that would incorporate the impact of mechanical harvesting on agronomic practices, biomass handling, post harvest care, packaging, processing and the use of intelligent films for packaging.

This includes capital expenditure and impacts that will require production system changes or adjustments. A number of Industry Issues common to the regions are reported for the purposes of removing barriers to industry technology adoption.


Alan Twomey

VG05073 Mechanical Harvesting of Selected Vegetables - Feasability study - 2006
Download 461kb

Summary :

Growth and margin in traditional processed vegetables is low, 2-3% value and 1% in volume and is not seen as an area where consumer demand can be stimulated.

Processors of frozen products have moved toward markets for frozen dinners containing vegetables where growth is significant in both value (30% per year) and volume (25% per year).

Growers, in order to compete with this directional change, will need to vastly improve their handling techniques, internal cost structures and negotiating skills.

This includes the obvious move to greater mechanization using machinery, robotics, more sophisticated grading and packing equipment, HACCP elements, a reduction in handling and greater on farm processing in order to bring better farm gate returns.

Adoption of mechanical harvesting has primarily been for mature crops such as peas, beans, potatoes, onions and carrots.

Entrepreneurial Growers have invented mechanical harvesters for broccoli, leeks and lettuce while others are currently engaged in development of harvesters for leafy vegetables, celery and cauliflower.

Currently there are two development platforms for mechanical harvesters :

  1. The first and most common is a system that harvests all of the biomass and allows the grading and further processing to be made off-field.

    Examples of this platform are those being used for broccoli, leeks, onions, lettuce, carrots and potatoes.

  2. The second platform is not widespread but is under serious development.

    It uses sensing devices to determine fitness for purpose of plants for harvest, sophisticated cutting and in field processing.

    Examples of this selective harvesting platform are being developed for lettuce and cauliflower.

    Crops considered for investment in mechanical harvesting included Asian Vegetables, Celery, Cauliflower, leafy salad, Tomato, Wongbok and Zucchini.

Barriers to adoption of new technologies were considered to be :

  • lack of understanding of the need to be internationally competitive

  • removal of extension support by governments

  • lack of co-ordination of R&D activities with extension

  • diffusion forces across the industry sector

  • the high risk associated with development at a farm level.


  1. Retailers were driving the agenda with respect to farm gate returns and as part of their process were reducing the number of suppliers to gain efficiency of delivery and all year supply capability.

  2. Processors were locked into mature markets with low growth and margin and only through new levels of convenience were they able to increase the growth rate. Hence Processors were under pressure to compete using imported vegetables rather than local sources that lacked competitive pricing.

  3. Consumers were looking for convenience, freshness and consistency of quality and price over the year.

  4. Loss of export markets had occurred as a result of declining competitive position for some crops and the emergence of low cost Chinese product in Asia.

  5. Growers were generally unaware of the cost structure required to make them internationally competitive. The competitor was seen as other local or regional Growers rather than international suppliers.

  6. Growers were aware of automation technologies but had not related the use of these to horticulture.

  7. Leading Growers had developed mechanical harvesters and achieved considerable cost reductions through labour saving. There was virtually no diffusion of these technologies across the industry.

  8. Imported mechanical harvesters were used in a range of crops that tended to be in more mature markets such as onions, carrots and potatoes and hence the gains had already been made.

  9. Mechanical Harvesting offers solutions to the sourcing of quality labour and removes many of the costs of labour. Overall reductions would vary with the type of crop and collectively would deliver between $60 and $100 million/year to farm gate returns from labour cost reductions and increased production of marketable products.

  10. Mechanical harvesting is not a stand alone proposition as the agronomic practices, harvesting, materials handling, minimal processing, supply logistics and marketing activities need to be treated as a complete system and R&D applied to every component of the system.

  11. Research and Development has generally been project oriented with emphasis on farm production and not system focused to achieve reduced costs, higher productivity and net market returns.

  12. Future R&D aimed at creating international competitiveness should be assessed by a broader based process having full chain expertise to ensure all parts of the supply system are included and coordinated.

  13. Future R&D in mechanical harvesting should be conducted by consortia having a range of expertise to address the needs of a total system rather than individual projects within a system.

  14. Extension capacity has been reduced as government services have been withdrawn and this important role may need to be expanded by AUSVEG.

  15. International benchmarking studies should become a regular feature for Growers, Equipment Suppliers and Manufacturers, extension and marketing persons. These studies need to provide quantifiable targets for productivity and qualitative information on trends in various marketplaces.

  16. Growers and Grower/Processors need to have increased skills in marketing and negotiation in order to keep the gains of increasing mechanization and automation at the farm gate and not allow them to be usurped by retailers and multi national processors.

  17. Potential emerging markets in plant extracts for use as ingredients in polymers, functional foods, cosmetics, cosmeceuticals, nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals provide mechanisms for Growers to reduce dependency on traditional fresh and processed vegetable sectors.

Acknowledgements :

The author wishes to acknowledge the considerable assistance provided by the :

  • Industry Development Officers

  • AusVeg management and staff

  • Government staff in primary industries

  • Growers who attended the information sessions and provided follow up information

  • Grower Processors who provided one on one sessions and insight into industry operations

  • Major Processors who provided a manufacturing perspective on the national and international competitiveness of the industry

  • Buyers of the Retail chains and Food Service distribution.

  • Celect Management for assistance with the marketing analysis

This project was funded by Horticulture Australia through the National Vegetable R&D Levy.

The Australian Government provides matched funding for all HAL’s R&D activities.

^ Back to top    


Victorian Vegetable Industry - 2014

Summary of the location, structure, production and performance of Victoria's vegetable industry prepared by the Victorian State Government in 2014. In... Read more...

Site supporters
Web design Melbourne | Web Agent AUSVEG VIC 2018